[Public WebGL] problematic more/ tests now part of 1.0.0 conformance suite

Tim Johansson [email protected]
Mon Feb 28 00:33:39 PST 2011


On 2011-02-27 17:45, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> For what it's worth, I filed
>     https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637077
> and I now completely agree that we should add a proper ImageData interface, despite still not knowing whether that kind of thing is normative.
>
> So this will probably be in Firefox 5; meanwhile, what I would like to know is whether the more/ directory is a requirement in order to be able to claim that we "pass the conformance test suite".
Yes, the tests in more are required. We all agreed in January that the 
more/ tests should be part of the conformance test suite as they found 
several important bugs in multiple implementations.

//Tim

> Benoit
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed that the more/ directory was moved to conformance/ so I
>> guess that I really have to make us pass them now if we don't want to
>> look bad. But the quickCheckAPI.html test is giving me headaches:
>>
>> * at quickCheckAPI.js:1050, we have this expression:
>>
>> ximage instanceof ImageData
>>
>> and it gives me this error: 'ImageData is not defined' in Firefox 4.
>> Do you think that's a bug in Firefox? I thought, perhaps wrongly, that
>> such type names were considered an internal thing.
>>
>> * at quickCheckAPI.js:342, we have:
>>
>> img = document.createElement('img');
>> img.width = w; img.height = h;
>>
>> which creates an image with 'void' image data, which generates an
>> exception in Firefox 4 when passed to texImage2D, but the test expects
>> that to work. Here I guess it really is a gray area?
>>
>> Unless you think that these are plain Firefox bugs, could we somehow
>> make it clear that more/ is not part of the conformance suite? Earlier
>> we had agreed to have the more/ tests not run by default by the online
>> runner, but I never took the time to write the patch (sorry).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Benoit
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with
>> the following command in the body of your email:
>> unsubscribe public_webgl
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with
> the following command in the body of your email:
> unsubscribe public_webgl
> -----------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with
the following command in the body of your email:
unsubscribe public_webgl
-----------------------------------------------------------




More information about the public_webgl mailing list