[Public WebGL] IDL still includes "raises" clauses, which WebIDL doesn't have anymore

Boris Zbarsky [email protected]
Tue Apr 3 06:45:53 PDT 2012

On 4/2/12 8:29 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this up.
> I've removed the "raises" clauses from the spec and webgl.idl,
> replacing them with comments indicating that the entry points may
> throw DOMException.

Thank you.  There was a problem with this edit.  The ';' at the end of 
the HTMLVideoElement overload of texImage2D in the spec has gone AWOL. 
Same for the ';' at the end of the HTMLCanvasElement and 
HTMLVideoElement overloads of texImage2D in the standalone IDL file.

Same thing for all three of the texSubImage2D overloads that take 
elements, in both the main spec and the standalone IDL.

> I'm unconvinced that removing the "raises" clauses from Web IDL was a
> good idea, but agree that WebGL should conform to the spec.

I think we're on the same page on both of those.  ;)


You are currently subscribed to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with
the following command in the body of your email:
unsubscribe public_webgl

More information about the public_webgl mailing list