[Public WebGL] IDL still includes "raises" clauses, which WebIDL doesn't have anymore

[Kenneth Russell]

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzb...@> wrote:
> On 4/2/12 8:29 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for bringing this up.
>>
>> I've removed the "raises" clauses from the spec and webgl.idl,
>> replacing them with comments indicating that the entry points may
>> throw DOMException.
>
>
> Thank you.  There was a problem with this edit.  The ';' at the end of the
> HTMLVideoElement overload of texImage2D in the spec has gone AWOL. Same for
> the ';' at the end of the HTMLCanvasElement and HTMLVideoElement overloads
> of texImage2D in the standalone IDL file.
>
> Same thing for all three of the texSubImage2D overloads that take elements,
> in both the main spec and the standalone IDL.

Thanks for catching this; fixed.

-Ken

>> I'm unconvinced that removing the "raises" clauses from Web IDL was a
>> good idea, but agree that WebGL should conform to the spec.
>
>
> I think we're on the same page on both of those.  ;)
>
> -Boris

-----------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to pub...@
To unsubscribe, send an email to maj...@ with
the following command in the body of your email:
unsubscribe public_webgl
-----------------------------------------------------------