[Public WebGL] IDL still includes "raises" clauses, which WebIDL doesn't have anymore

Kenneth Russell [email protected]
Tue Apr 3 09:36:14 PDT 2012

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4/2/12 8:29 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
>> Thanks for bringing this up.
>> I've removed the "raises" clauses from the spec and webgl.idl,
>> replacing them with comments indicating that the entry points may
>> throw DOMException.
> Thank you.  There was a problem with this edit.  The ';' at the end of the
> HTMLVideoElement overload of texImage2D in the spec has gone AWOL. Same for
> the ';' at the end of the HTMLCanvasElement and HTMLVideoElement overloads
> of texImage2D in the standalone IDL file.
> Same thing for all three of the texSubImage2D overloads that take elements,
> in both the main spec and the standalone IDL.

Thanks for catching this; fixed.


>> I'm unconvinced that removing the "raises" clauses from Web IDL was a
>> good idea, but agree that WebGL should conform to the spec.
> I think we're on the same page on both of those.  ;)
> -Boris

You are currently subscribed to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with
the following command in the body of your email:
unsubscribe public_webgl

More information about the public_webgl mailing list