[Public WebGL] Re: texture_float should imply color_buffer_float

Olli Etuaho [email protected]
Sun Nov 23 23:41:41 PST 2014

Was the conclusion here that RGB32F will be entirely removed from the extension, rather than made optional? That will break some content that's already out there, though not terribly much of it. I can make a pull request to change the spec, once you confirm the intention.

About the tests - as long as fulfilling the commitment to write the tests does not take terribly long, I agree that's enough for moving the extension forward.


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Florian Bösch <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 8:30 AM
To: Jeff Gilbert
Cc: public webgl
Subject: Re: [Public WebGL] Re: texture_float should imply color_buffer_float

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Jeff Gilbert <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Also, IIRC, there's no Float16Array yet, so we're stuck with Uint16Array.

 Restarted debate on that on es-discuss. https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2014-November/040377.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://khronos.org/pipermail/public_webgl_khronos.org/attachments/20141124/2d26e94f/attachment.html>

More information about the public_webgl mailing list