[Public WebGL] WEBGL_subscribe_uniform extension

Florian Bösch [email protected]
Fri Mar 27 03:14:26 PDT 2015


Hey Ken,

Thank you for the clarification. Do you have a timeframe until evaluations
by interested parties will conclude?

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Kenneth Russell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Florian,
>
> While Owen's no longer working on this piece of functionality,
> Artillery is still investigating its potential. It's been mentioned
> that it may also be useful for WebVR scenarios in order to deliver the
> head tracker's most up-to-date orientation directly to the end of the
> graphics pipeline.
>
> Our team is focused 100% right now on getting a WebGL 2.0 prototype in
> the hands of developers, and we don't have the time to move this
> extension forward right now. Nonetheless, since the idea may have some
> value, let's leave it as a proposal for the time being.
>
> -Ken
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Florian Bösch <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Owen Glofcheski is no longer reachable under his previous mail address.
> The
> > issue has also not rejected. And no further input has been provided
> despite
> > the deadline passing by a generous margin and repeated polling.
> >
> > Ken please clarify the holdup.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Florian Bösch <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Florian Bösch <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Are we going to fail reaching consensus on the requirement to have this
> >>> extension?
> >>> Can we reach consensus to provide it without an extension?
> >>>
> >>> I would propose that in case of #2 we can reject this extension. In
> case
> >>> #1 persists or no further input is provided until February 24th 2015,
> that
> >>> this extension be rejected, a suitable pull request has been prepared:
> >>> https://github.com/KhronosGroup/WebGL/pull/828
> >>
> >>
> >> No further discussion on WEBGL_subscribe_uniform has ensued, and no
> >> further input has been provided. A previously set deadline for comment
> >> (February 24th 2015) has now passed by a month, and from this I surmise
> that
> >> this extension proposal is abandoned.
> >>
> >> Ken, I strongly suggest merging this pull request which moves that
> >> extension to rejected: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/WebGL/pull/828
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://khronos.org/pipermail/public_webgl_khronos.org/attachments/20150327/fb301b4b/attachment.html>


More information about the public_webgl mailing list